Every engagement runs the same model: Lenny at the center, Niko shipping code, Mira writing the spec, Nova running QA. The shape of the engagement changes — the discipline doesn't.
Ship product features, bug fixes, or new surfaces using the agentic dev team. You define the outcomes — stories, acceptance criteria, and delivery are handled end to end. Every PR is scoped, tested, and reviewed before it touches your codebase.
Lenny joins your team as a senior developer — and brings the agents with him. Your team gets a senior contributor who ships at team velocity, integrates with your tools, and brings no management overhead. The agent team is included.
Take an idea from design to production in weeks, not months. The full agentic team — architecture, implementation, QA, and UI — running in parallel. When it ships, you own it completely: code, infrastructure, process.
Stand up the agentic dev team model at your organization, then exit when it runs. Design the agent roles, configure the infrastructure, run the first sprint alongside your team, and hand off a working system. The exit is a feature — we're not incentivized to stay.
A focused build — one feature set, one surface, one sprint. Fast to scope, fast to ship. Low commitment, real output.
A full feature set or MVP. Architecture to deployment, with evals baked in at every step. You own the codebase at handoff.
Lenny and the agents on your team, ongoing. Senior velocity, no management overhead, cancel any time.
Have a feature that should already be shipped?
